**keep up to date with us on Facebook**

No Pylons (Lincolnshire)

No Pylons (Lincolnshire) No Pylons (Lincolnshire) No Pylons (Lincolnshire)
Home
What, Why and how.
Campaigns Do Work
FAQ
What you can do
Printables
Dates for your diary
The Facts
The Offshore Solution
OFFICIAL OBJECTIONS
Video
Press
Other Proposals
Impact on real people

No Pylons (Lincolnshire)

No Pylons (Lincolnshire) No Pylons (Lincolnshire) No Pylons (Lincolnshire)
Home
What, Why and how.
Campaigns Do Work
FAQ
What you can do
Printables
Dates for your diary
The Facts
The Offshore Solution
OFFICIAL OBJECTIONS
Video
Press
Other Proposals
Impact on real people
More
  • Home
  • What, Why and how.
  • Campaigns Do Work
  • FAQ
  • What you can do
  • Printables
  • Dates for your diary
  • The Facts
  • The Offshore Solution
  • OFFICIAL OBJECTIONS
  • Video
  • Press
  • Other Proposals
  • Impact on real people
  • Home
  • What, Why and how.
  • Campaigns Do Work
  • FAQ
  • What you can do
  • Printables
  • Dates for your diary
  • The Facts
  • The Offshore Solution
  • OFFICIAL OBJECTIONS
  • Video
  • Press
  • Other Proposals
  • Impact on real people

Object

At Nopylons, we understand that creating a meaningful objection can be daunting, there are so many aspects to consider. So we have made it a little easier by creating a basic customisable objection template that will give you a head start.

OBJECT

What you can do now



Join the Facebook group

Our Facebook group has almost 4500 members just like you who are facing an uncertain future at the hands of National Grid. It is a great place to find and share up-to-date information and be a part of the campaign..

Share, share, share! 


Contact your MP : to find contact details for your local MP HERE


SEND YOUR FEEDBACK TO THE PROPOSALS



Sign the petition

 

We are calling for Ed Miliband to removed from the decision making process of Nationally significant Energy infrastructure. We believe that there is sufficient evidence to show that he is unable to make balanced decisions in his haste to reach net zero - whilst we believe that is worthy goal it should not be at all costs, projects need to be assessed on merit not just a net zero target.

Below is the supporting legal evidence we feel should be applied.


The Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP, has demonstrated predetermination in favour of green energy infrastructure, compromising his ability to assess planning decisions impartially. It calls for his recusal from infrastructure planning decisions, particularly those involving compulsory acquisition and NSIP designation, under principles of natural justice, Wednesbury reasonableness, and apparent bias. 

 Legal Framework 
Predetermination and Bias 

  • Localism Act 2011, Section 25: Codifies that decision-makers must not have a closed mind when making decisions. 
  • Magill v Porter [2002] 2 AC 357: Established the test for apparent bias—whether a fair-minded and informed observer would conclude there is a real possibility of bias. 
  • Kelton v Wiltshire Council [2015] EWHC 2853 (Admin): Reinforces that councillors must avoid the appearance of bias even if actions are above reproach. 
  • Wednesbury Unreasonableness (Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corp [1948]): A decision is unlawful if it is so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could have made it. 

Application to Ministerial Conduct 

  • Ministers are bound by public law principles, including impartiality and procedural fairness. 
  • Bias and Predetermination in Planning Law – Landmark Chambers: Notes that even elected officials must not act with a closed mind when exercising quasi-judicial functions. 
  • Westferry Printworks Case (2020): Planning decision quashed due to apparent bias and timing manipulation by Secretary of State. 

Evidence of Predetermination 
 Public Statements 
Miliband’s speech at the Energy UK Conference outlined a “clean energy imperative,” framing green infrastructure as the solution to all national challenges. 
He stated: “British-based renewable energy is the cheapest and fastest way to reduce vulnerability to volatile global fossil fuel markets.” 

 Policy Commitments 

  • Miliband’s 2030 Mission Control plan commits to 95% clean energy on the grid, requiring rapid infrastructure rollout regardless of local opposition or strategic planning delays. 
  • His department’s NESO report was criticized for using inflated gas and carbon price assumptions to justify grid expansion. 
     Public Criticism 
  • Centre for Policy Studies: Accused Miliband of “spin and ideology rather than data and evidence,” citing flawed assumptions in his energy plans. 
  • City AM: Warned that Miliband’s net zero obsession risks alienating the public and undermining the energy transition. 
    . Implications for Planning Decisions 
  • Miliband’s ideological commitment to green energy risks overriding:
    • Strategic need assessments. 
    • Procedural fairness in NSIP designation. 
    • Landowner rights under Section 122 of the Planning Act 2008. 

His role in approving or influencing infrastructure planning decisions may breach: 

  • Natural justice principles. 
  • Wednesbury reasonableness. 
  • Apparent bias tests under Magill and Westferry precedents. 

 Recommendations 
Ministerial Recusal 
Ed Miliband should be formally recused from infrastructure planning decisions involving: 

  • NSIP designation. 
  • Compulsory acquisition powers. 
  • Strategic grid rollout. 

 Parliamentary Oversight 

  • A Select Committee investigation into predetermination risks in infrastructure planning. 
  • Review of ministerial statements and NESO modelling assumptions. 
  • Automatic government funded Judicial review into ALL projects Miliband has approved since taking post. 

Legislative Reform 

  • Amend Planning Act 2008 to require independent review of ministerial decisions where strategic need is disputed. 
  • Review section 122 of the Planning Act 2008 and limit its use by private businesses and protect the rights of landowners. 
  • Introduce statutory safeguards against ideological bias in infrastructure planning. 

Please sign HERE  

Contact Us

Drop us a line!

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Nopylons

Copyright © 2025 Nopylons - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

  • Privacy Policy
help fund our campaign

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept