At Nopylons, we understand that creating a meaningful objection can be daunting, there are so many aspects to consider. So we have made it a little easier by creating a basic customisable objection template that will give you a head start.
Our Facebook group has almost 4500 members just like you who are facing an uncertain future at the hands of National Grid. It is a great place to find and share up-to-date information and be a part of the campaign..
Share, share, share!
Contact your MP : to find contact details for your local MP HERE
SEND YOUR FEEDBACK TO THE PROPOSALS
We are calling for Ed Miliband to removed from the decision making process of Nationally significant Energy infrastructure. We believe that there is sufficient evidence to show that he is unable to make balanced decisions in his haste to reach net zero - whilst we believe that is worthy goal it should not be at all costs, projects need to be assessed on merit not just a net zero target.
Below is the supporting legal evidence we feel should be applied.
The Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP, has demonstrated predetermination in favour of green energy infrastructure, compromising his ability to assess planning decisions impartially. It calls for his recusal from infrastructure planning decisions, particularly those involving compulsory acquisition and NSIP designation, under principles of natural justice, Wednesbury reasonableness, and apparent bias.
Legal Framework
Predetermination and Bias
Application to Ministerial Conduct
Evidence of Predetermination
Public Statements
Miliband’s speech at the Energy UK Conference outlined a “clean energy imperative,” framing green infrastructure as the solution to all national challenges.
He stated: “British-based renewable energy is the cheapest and fastest way to reduce vulnerability to volatile global fossil fuel markets.”
Policy Commitments
His role in approving or influencing infrastructure planning decisions may breach:
Recommendations
Ministerial Recusal
Ed Miliband should be formally recused from infrastructure planning decisions involving:
Parliamentary Oversight
Legislative Reform